Retro Games Ltd (RGL) have partnered with PLAION to bring the wonderful world of the Atari 400, 800, 5200 and XE/XL range to life in a now famous mini form factor. THE400 Mini using modern days connections like HDMI and USB, will soon be available (and may be pre-ordered now) in "console" form.
The famous Atari 400, along with its "more serious" and compatible 800 model, were initially announced in December 1978 by Atari to follow up on its successful 2600 Video Computer System. It offered many advanced features for a personal computer of that era, and eventually launched to retail in October 1979. Until then, Commodore, Apple and Radio Shack had been slogging it out for dominance in this fast growing personal computer market. Atari entering this fight was significant, and the 400 model was pretty formidable, especially when it came to computer graphics.
Offering high resolution graphics of up to 320 x 192 pixels, utilising hardware sprites, and having a palette of 128 colours, all through a standard television set, meant that this computer was going to be good for playing video games. And its 40 x 24 character display made it equally good for the applications of the day. Being powered by the popular 6502 Central Processing Unit (CPU) at 1.8Mhz, which [in raw Mhz] was faster than both Commodore's and Apple's offerings (I won't compare this to the Radio Shack's TRS-80 as comparing a 6502-based processor to a Z80-based processor is folly). From 1980 through to around 1986, the Atari 8-bit computer range had some seriously good entertainment software produced for it, by then upcoming and staple video game developers like Activision, Epyx, Datasoft, and Atari itself.
From around 1986, the Atari 8-bit personal computer platform began to fade, even with improvements made to the compatible XE and XL range, which could display 256 colours and had a few more graphics modes. Commodore, with its C64, largely won the home computer war, and this model wouldn't die until around 1992. Remember that the C64 competed against (in many ways) more technically capable machines like the Commodore Amiga or Atari ST for over half of its commercial life. To still be a relevant in 1990 was quite a feat.
What I find most interesting about the announcement of THE400 Mini is its price point. And I'm taking nothing away from its perfect replica form factor.
THE400 Mini will be pre-loaded with 25 licensed games, and will provide a way to load your own legally purchased or public domain software by "side-loading" tape, disk or cartridge images. Knowing RGL as I do, I'm certain that it will support THE400 through firmware updates based on user feedback, so you will be able to buy with some confidence. I note that other "Mini" console producers do not offer this. Releasing a new firmware update is timely and costly, and provides RGL with no additional revenue.
I think the promised feature to "rewind" your gameplay by up to 40 seconds is interesting, and I guess this may be more convenient than the "saved game states" on THEC64 or THEA500 Mini. It is the price point of £99.99 that I think makes THEC64 Mini and even THEC64 Classic, or THEVIC20 (if you can find one) look very good value indeed.
THEC64 Mini launched at £69.99, and included 64 licensed games. It has since had several firmware updates, adding more games of varying quality to the carousel. Like THE400, THEC64 allows you to side-load any tape, disk, or cartridge images of software that you own. It includes one joystick and all the necessary cables to get you started. Although some will say that the joystick included with THEC64 Mini wasn't good quality, the joystick included with THE400 won't be worth £30 more. So, THE400 has more USB ports, but THEC64 Mini can use a cheap USB extender. One thing I don't know is if THE400 will include a decent USB power adapter, but looking at both THEC64 Mini and THEA500 Mini, it is likely that it will not, though it may require lower power consumption and/or not run so hot as some versions of THEC64 Mini.
THEC64 Classic and THEVIC20 launched at £119.99 (some sources say £109.99), which included an improved joystick (especially on THEVIC20), with a fully working and correctly mapped keyboard, more USB ports and a USB power adapter, and all of the necessary cables to get you started. All firmware updates to THEC64 Mini also work on THEC64 Classic, and THEVIC20. So, you legally have over 64 games if you have the latest firmware version, and many good features that some C64 fans will love, like being able to emulate the Commodore Ram Expansion Unit (REU), or the ability to play four-player adapter games, like Bomb Mania, from Protovision.
Aside from entertainment software, you have much more choice of other types of software too. I could write many pages just about the GEOS operating system, which by itself had all kinds of productivity, utilities and so on. The Commodore C64's library of games alone certainly exceeds the cumulative totals of all models of the Atari 8-bit personal computer range. And THEC64 Classic can also play VIC-20 games too. A lazy estimate is that owners or THEC64 Classic and THEVIC20 will have at least 10,000 software titles to pick from. As you might have guessed, these are not that difficult to find these days, and even after the commercial demise of the C64, there has still been lots of software released for it considering that it was a commercially dead platform for at least 15 years after 1992.
Could this therefore be a sign that THEC64 platform is about to be discontinued? Or will hard-nosed consumers simply make a cold decision that, because many games on the Atari 400/800/XE/XL had comparable versions on either the C64 or the VIC-20, or both, that THEC64 Classic or Mini is simply better value? If the latter is the case, this may mean that THEC64 has, at least, another year at retail in it.
All of this means, at least to me, that THE400's success is in the balance, although I'm sure that many people will be pre-ordering this right now. RGL already have a product that will fit many gamers who were around from ~1981 through to the early 1990s - or those people who don't want to mess around with a Raspberry Pi and spend time configuring it with this or that emulator. The Atari 400/800/XE/XL was only a significant player for about half the 1980s, with the 5200 model only really a footnote in all of this. The VIC-20 was significant from 1980-1984, and the C64 from 1982 through to the end of that decade. But is the Atari name enough to carry this new product? And will it at least sell as well as THEC64 Mini when you are paying more to get less? Time will tell.
A side note to this is that it kind of reminds me of when Commodore launched its Plus/4 model in 1984: the Plus/4 was too similar to the C64 in many ways but without a better sound chip, and although it could display more colours, it could not do hardware sprites like the C64, and did not use the most common joystick type. Okay, so the Plus/4 was meant for a different market, to compete at the low end with the Sinclair/Timex machines, but somehow it ended up launching at $299USD. By the time of its launch, the C64 was certainly no more expensive than this, and had already started to have a second user market, and had a vaster software library. It all sounds too familar.
But all of this said, I'll probably be purchasing THE400 Mini myself because it looks like a lovingly created Mini console with a beautiful aesthetic. Because I guess a fool and his money really is easily parted.
Edited by Mike Mee. Many thanks for your help Mike.
No comments:
Post a Comment